Alleged irregularities in forest management within Kerala’s Chalakudy Forest Division have drawn sharp criticism from environmental groups, placing proposed solar fencing works and related activities under close examination. Activists claim that large-scale tree marking and potential felling linked to a hanging solar fence project could affect up to 20,000 trees, raising serious questions about ecological impact, statutory compliance and the long-term effectiveness of such interventions in mitigating human-wildlife conflict.
Growing Concerns Over Tree Marking and Felling
Environmental organisation Animals and Nature Ethics Community (ANEC Trust) has formally raised the issue with the Supreme Court-constituted Central Empowered Committee (CEC), the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and senior officials of the Kerala Forest Department. In a supplementary representation submitted in mid-October 2026, the Trust sought an immediate halt to tree felling and associated works.
According to the group, serial numbers on marked trees have already crossed 6,000, while the overall number of trees that could be affected is estimated at around 20,000. Marking has reportedly taken place along an approximately 13-kilometre stretch connecting Vellikulangara, Karikkadavu and Vellaram Padam, as well as forest stretches towards Kormala in the Pariyaram Range. Photographs submitted with the representation show numerous mature trees marked for removal.
The Trust has called for an independent field inspection and a comprehensive range-wise inventory to verify the exact number of trees involved and the precise alignment of the proposed fencing. It has also questioned whether extensive tree removal is necessary for installing a hanging solar fence and urged authorities to explore less destructive alternatives, such as using existing clearings, already disturbed forest boundaries or modified alignments that minimise damage to forest ecosystems.
Ecological Risks Highlighted
Activists warn that large-scale tree felling, combined with fencing and possible trenching, could lead to habitat degradation, damage to riparian vegetation, disruption of natural drainage patterns and fragmentation of ecological connectivity. Of particular concern is the potential obstruction of established elephant movement corridors. Ironically, interventions intended to reduce human-elephant conflict could, if poorly designed, exacerbate the problem by altering animal pathways and increasing pressure on remaining forest patches.
The Chalakudy forests form part of a sensitive landscape that supports diverse wildlife and plays a role in regional ecological balance. Any significant alteration to canopy cover or understorey structure requires careful assessment under forest conservation laws and established guidelines for vista clearance and fencing works.
Parallel Allegations of Forest Land Diversion
Separate complaints have also surfaced regarding the alleged unauthorised use of forest land for non-forestry purposes. Environmentalists have alleged that forest land in the Nayarangadi area was handed over for developing a playground for a Model Residential School for tribal girls. Critics contend that the transfer and subsequent activities, including reported quarrying and tree removal, violated conditions that the land should remain forest land and that construction materials should be brought from outside.
Complaints further claim that hundreds of trees, including valuable species, were cut, with only a limited number formally auctioned, and that valuation methods used may not have followed prescribed procedures, resulting in potential financial loss to the exchequer. These allegations form part of a broader pattern of concerns about governance and accountability within the division.
Context of Solar Fencing Initiatives
Solar and hanging solar fences have been promoted in Kerala as a means to reduce human-wildlife conflict, particularly elephant incursions into human habitations. Earlier projects in the Chalakudy region, including stretches along the Chalakudy River, were inaugurated with the stated aim of protecting both communities and wildlife. The Forest Department has also floated tenders for the supply of equipment and materials required for the erection, maintenance and upkeep of solar and hanging fencing systems in the division.
While the objective of reducing conflict is widely acknowledged as legitimate, environmental groups argue that the methods employed must strictly adhere to legal requirements for tree enumeration, marking, valuation, approval and disposal. They maintain that bypassing these safeguards undermines both environmental protection and public trust.
Calls for Independent Scrutiny
ANEC Trust has specifically demanded an independent technical, financial and ecological audit of earlier hanging solar fence projects in the area, including the Thumburmuzhi-Pillappara stretch. Such an audit, it argues, should examine the extent of tree removal, any changes in fencing alignment, expenditure incurred, operational performance and the actual effectiveness of the fences in reducing conflict.
The Central Empowered Committee, which has previously directed the Kerala Forest Department and the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau to submit joint responses on related matters, is expected to play a key role in examining the current complaints. Environmentalists have stressed that irreversible activities should be suspended until the project’s ecological impact and legal compliance are thoroughly assessed.
Balancing Conflict Mitigation and Conservation
The situation in Chalakudy highlights a recurring tension in forest management: the need to protect human lives and livelihoods from wildlife conflict while preserving the integrity of forest ecosystems. Solar fencing can be an effective tool when properly planned, aligned with existing landscape features and implemented with minimal ecological disruption. However, large-scale removal of mature trees risks undermining the very habitats that sustain wildlife and provide essential ecosystem services.
Transparent enumeration of trees, rigorous environmental assessment, public disclosure of project details and independent monitoring are essential to ensure that conflict-mitigation measures do not themselves become sources of ecological harm. The response of the Forest Department, the Central Empowered Committee and state authorities to the current complaints will be closely watched by conservationists, local communities and the wider public.
As scrutiny intensifies, the Chalakudy case serves as a reminder that sustainable solutions to human-wildlife conflict must rest on scientific assessment, legal compliance and a genuine commitment to long-term forest conservation rather than short-term engineering interventions alone.
Read more – starbiofact.com
Martin